Lemma 14.4, Case I: the same-constant scalar absorption edge #
The three displayed side terms in the current Case-I API are the Claim-14.5
Σ₀ budget, the Lemma-8.7 endpoint in Σ₁₁, and the Lemma-8.7 endpoint in
Σ₁₂. Suzuki's (14.23) reduces their sum to a fixed multiple of
B / (log (log D) * sourceSigma D d),
where B is the inherited same-C budget. The theorem below proves, rather
than assumes, that every such fixed source-order side term is eventually paid
for by the canonical midpoint gap from Claim 14.6(iii).
The exact Σ₁₁ endpoint term displayed by the internal Lemma-8.7 bound.
Equations
Instances For
The literal sum of all explicit Case-I side budgets currently exposed by
Σ₀, Σ₁₁, and Σ₁₂. No absorption inequality is a field of this object.
Equations
- MathlibNt.SieveTheory.caseIExplicitSideBudget S H N D z C C145 K β d Δ s τ σ = MathlibNt.SieveTheory.suzukiSigmaZeroClaim145Budget S H N D z d Δ σ K C145 + MathlibNt.SieveTheory.caseISigma11EndpointRemainder S N D z K β s τ σ + MathlibNt.SieveTheory.sigma12EndpointRemainder S H N D z C K d Δ s σ
Instances For
The source-order coefficient in Suzuki (14.23).
Equations
Instances For
The canonical midpoint strict factor leaves at least half of the elementary Claim-14.6 gap.
Every fixed source-order side coefficient is eventually absorbed by the
same-C midpoint gap. This is the complete scalar step in (14.23); its proof
uses the literal sourceSigma and the growth of log (log D).
Budget-valued form of the scalar theorem. The side term is the proved source-order majorant, not an assumed absorption inequality.
Case-I's three displayed remainder families have one Claim-14.5 constant
and two Lemma-8.7 endpoint constants 6 K². For fixed positive K, their
combined source-order coefficient is therefore eventually inside the same-C
gap. The theorem is scalar: it makes no assumption of the desired absorption
inequality.
Earliest remaining non-scalar edge. It says that the literal sum of the
three explicit API budgets has Suzuki's source order. This is deliberately a
frozen proposition (not an axiom and not a premise of the scalar absorption
theorems): the reachable production cone contains no theorem simultaneously
normalising the Claim-14.5 Σ₀ sum and the two Lemma-8.7 endpoints to the
inherited errorEnvelope budget.
Equations
- MathlibNt.SieveTheory.Lemma144CaseIExplicitRemaindersSourceOrder = ∀ (S : BoundingSieve) (H : MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.Section13HatLayers) (N : ℕ) (C C145 K β d Δ s τ : ℝ), ∃ (A : ℝ), 0 ≤ A ∧ ∀ᶠ (D : ℕ) in Filter.atTop, have σ := MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.sourceSigma (↑D) d; have z := ⌈↑D ^ (1 / s)⌉₊; MathlibNt.SieveTheory.caseIExplicitSideBudget S H N D z C C145 K β d Δ s τ σ ≤ MathlibNt.SieveTheory.caseISourceOrderCoefficient A (↑D) d * MathlibNt.SieveTheory.sigma12InheritedBudget S H N D z C K d Δ s