Lemma 14.4: the low-prime endpoint and the uniformity boundary #
The discrete object in Claim 14.5 has real cutoff arguments, whereas the actual
recurrence has natural cutoff arguments. suzukiActualTReal is the canonical
rounded adapter. On the natural arguments occurring in the recurrence it is
literally suzukiActualT.
The currently reachable Claim-14.5 interface is pointwise eventual: N, s
and the other endpoint data are fixed before its threshold is chosen. In the
low-prime sum, however, s = recursiveCoordinate D p, and both that coordinate
and the carrier prime vary after the outer D is chosen. Consequently the
pointwise theorem does not justify moving its threshold in front of D.
ActualSigmaZeroClaim145Uniformity freezes exactly that missing quantifier
swap. The final theorem below is only the finite-sum algebra showing that this
uniform statement is sufficient; it is not advertised as an internal proof of
the missing uniformity.
Real-argument adapter for the actual natural-valued parity aggregate.
Equations
Instances For
The sum of the pointwise Claim-14.5 budgets at the literal recursive arguments of the low-prime part of (14.9).
Equations
- MathlibNt.SieveTheory.suzukiSigmaZeroClaim145Budget S H N D z d Δ σ K C145 = ∑ p ∈ MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.suzukiSupportedBelow S z with ↑p < ↑D ^ (1 / σ), S.nu p * (C145 * MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.claim14_5Scale S H (N - 1) (↑(D ⌈/⌉ p)) d Δ σ K (MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144Equation1410.recursiveCoordinate D p))
Instances For
The genuine uniformity needed to apply Claim 14.5 inside Σ₀.
The threshold is selected before D, N, and the carrier prime. The two
coordinate hypotheses are the actual Claim-14.5 domain hypotheses; neither a
Claim-14.5 conclusion nor a bound for Σ₀ is hidden among the source data of a
purported endpoint theorem.
Equations
- MathlibNt.SieveTheory.ActualSigmaZeroClaim145Uniformity S H d Δ σ K C145 = ∃ (D₀ : ℝ), 1 < D₀ ∧ ∀ (D N z p : ℕ), D₀ ≤ ↑D → 2 ≤ N → p ∈ {q ∈ MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.suzukiSupportedBelow S z | ↑q < ↑D ^ (1 / σ)} → 2 ≤ D ⌈/⌉ p → MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144Equation1410.recursiveCoordinate D p ∈ MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SuzukiFiniteContinuousLayers.suzukiParityDomainOne 2 (N - 1) → MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144Equation1410.recursiveCoordinate D p ≤ σ → MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.Claim14_5Bound (MathlibNt.SieveTheory.suzukiActualTReal S) S H (N - 1) (↑(D ⌈/⌉ p)) (↑p) d Δ σ K (MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144Equation1410.recursiveCoordinate D p) C145
Instances For
Once the genuinely uniform Claim-14.5 statement is available, the endpoint
estimate is just monotonicity of the finite low-prime sum. This lemma makes the
remaining analytic obligation exact; it does not accept the desired Σ₀
inequality as a premise.