Fubini reindexing on the open triangular region
0 < a < b, a < x < u. The explicit integrability premise is the exact
hypothesis needed before the positive-depth upper Rosser source recursion can
be rearranged.
The packaged source integral with inherited upper face b.
Equations
Instances For
The first positive-depth triangular Fubini kernel is genuinely integrable.
The proof uses the exact recursive support cutoff to remove the singular face
a = 0, then a uniform finite-depth bound on the remaining compact triangle.
The outer source integral after unfolding one Rosser pair, with the first triangular Fubini swap justified by the preceding strict integrability theorem.
For every outer coordinate, the remaining (a,x₁) triangle is integrable.
This is the strict integrability input for the second Fubini rearrangement.
After the second Fubini swap, the innermost a-integral is exactly the
source package with inherited upper face x₁.
The first strict reciprocal substitution, after homogeneity normalizes the
inherited upper face: v = A / x sends (0,x₀) to (A/x₀,∞).
The successor source after the first strict variable replacement. The
remaining inner integrand now has normalized upper face 1, ready for the
first κ = 1 Suzuki recursion.
The second strict reciprocal substitution x₀ = s / t. Together with the
preceding v = (s - x₀) / x₁ substitution, this is exactly the two-step
κ = 1 Suzuki kernel, before its support is truncated to finite intervals.
On the upper fundamental-lemma window, the reciprocal image of the cubic outer face is exactly the lower endpoint in the odd Suzuki recursion.
The second reciprocal substitution with its lower endpoint written in the
literal first suzukiLayer_succ_succ form. The only remaining difference from
the twice-recursed Suzuki layer is replacement of the two improper tails by
their finite support intervals and identification of the residual source.
Unfolding the target odd Suzuki layer twice gives the finite-interval kernel which the preceding source formula must match.
Exact residual after both nonlinear substitutions. It contains only the two support truncations and the predecessor source/layer identification; all Jacobians, endpoints, and Suzuki recursion algebra have already been fixed.
Equations
- MathlibNt.SieveTheory.LinearSieve.UpperRosserBoundarySourceSuccTailAlignment = ∀ (k : ℕ) (s : ℝ), 3 / 2 ≤ s → s ≤ 4 → ∫ (t : ℝ) in Set.Ioi (MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SuzukiFiniteContinuousLayers.recursionLower 2 s (2 * (k + 1) + 1)), (t - 1)⁻¹ * ∫ (v : ℝ) in Set.Ioi (t - 1), MathlibNt.SieveTheory.LinearSieve.upperRosserBoundarySourceIntegral k (v - 1) 1 = ∫ (t : ℝ) in MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SuzukiFiniteContinuousLayers.recursionLower 2 s (2 * (k + 1) + 1)..2 + ↑(2 * (k + 1) + 1), ((t - 1) ^ 1)⁻¹ * ∫ (v : ℝ) in MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SuzukiFiniteContinuousLayers.recursionLower 2 (t - 1) (2 * k + 2)..2 + ↑(2 * k + 2), MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SuzukiFiniteContinuousLayers.suzukiLayer 1 2 (2 * k + 1) (v - 1)
Instances For
The strongest exact assembler at the current boundary: the literal tail alignment above closes the requested successor-layer identity with no sieve or density hypothesis.
The tail alignment is unconditional. The predecessor identity used under both improper integrals is supplied by the global positive-source induction; the open lower endpoints are handled only almost everywhere.
Unconditional successor-layer identity.