Proposition 13.1(iii): quantitative hat-tail decay #
Section13HatContract records the DDE, initial values, positivity, and only the
qualitative limit weightedHat → 0. The missing publication interface is a
quantitative modulus for the adjacent tail ratio. The upstream contract below
records the source-strength (M log (eM))⁻² estimate at M; monotonicity from
the DDE then compares M with every s ≤ M. Thus this is not the downstream
consumer contract (which has already forgotten the logarithmic gain).
Minimal source-level asymptotic datum: the stronger adjacent-value estimate
of Proposition 13.1(iii), retaining its logarithmic gain. It is independent of
D, d, Δ, sourceSigma, lambda, and the Claim 14.6 integral.
Equations
- MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.Section13HatAsymptoticContract H = ∃ (C : ℝ), 0 ≤ C ∧ ∀ (sign : MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.ErrorSign) (M : ℝ), 4 ≤ M → MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.weightedHat H sign (M + 2) ≤ C / (M * Real.log (Real.exp 1 * M)) ^ 2 * MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.weightedHat H sign M
Instances For
The DDE makes the weighted hat layer antitone even when the left endpoint is exactly the delay threshold. The production strict-endpoint lemma cannot be applied directly there, but its derivative proof works on the interior.
Source-strength Proposition 13.1(iii): the adjacent asymptotic estimate plus
DDE monotonicity gives the full ratio estimate for every source point s ≤ M.
Forgetting the logarithmic gain yields exactly the moving proof's
Proposition131TailDecayContract.