Case-I successor geometry: the first non-automatic edge #
This file audits the pointwise-in-D hypotheses of the uniform Case-I
successor in their actual order. The moving source cutoff and both power
cutoffs are automatic, uniformly in every Case-I coordinate s ≤ σ(D).
The next strict source-domain inequality is not automatic at the legal odd
boundary N = 3, s = 3; it is therefore frozen as the first genuine premise.
The geometry available before the first strict source-domain premise.
Instances For
A single cutoff depending only on d gives all geometry preceding the
strict Section-13 threshold, uniformly in N and in every Case-I coordinate
2 ≤ s ≤ sourceSigma D d.
The first premise not supplied by the global IH, parity domains, and the source contract. Naming it prevents a chain of pointwise implications from making the uniform successor vacuous.
Equations
Instances For
N=3, s=3 is a literal legal parity-boundary point, including the weak
source lower bound used by the uniform Σ₁₂ theorem.
At that legal point every source contract has betaHat = 2, so the strict
threshold demanded next by the successor is false. This is a theorem-level
counterexample to deriving the threshold from the advertised inputs.
The subsequent odd cubic condition is independently non-automatic for a
natural ceiling: at D=2, s=3, the ceiling is 2, whose cube exceeds D.
Thus even strengthening the first strict edge would not justify silently
manufacturing z^3 ≤ D from ceiling geometry.