Documentation

MathlibNt.SieveTheory.LinearSieve.Suzuki.SuzukiCaseIIEndpointFiniteAbsorption

The three non-integral pieces of the transported Case-II endpoint error, with the integral in caseIIEndpointQD omitted. The power coordinates are kept as real variables so that their exact logarithmic identities can be used.

Equations
Instances For

    A named coefficient for the cubic q_D(3)/log w endpoint term.

    Equations
    Instances For
      theorem MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.caseII_nonIntegral_endpoint_corrections_separate {H : Section13HatLayers} {N : } {D y w d Δ σ C K s : } (hH : Section13HatContract H 2) (hN : Odd N) (hD : Real.exp 1 D) (hy : y = D ^ (1 / 3)) (hw : w = D ^ (1 / σ)) ( : 0 < σ) (hs1 : 1 < s) (_hs3 : s 3) (hK : 0 K) (hC : 0 C) (hsmall : 3 ^ d Real.log D) :
      3 / s * (K / Real.log y) * SuzukiFiniteContinuousLayers.finiteSourceLayer 1 2 N 3 + 3 / s * (1 + K / Real.log y) * (6 * K ^ 2 * SuzukiFiniteContinuousLayers.finiteSourceLayer 1 2 (N - 1) 2 / Real.log w * (3 / 3)) caseIIAlgebraicEndpointCoeff N σ K / Real.log D 3 / s * (1 + K / Real.log y) * (C * Real.exp K * Real.log D ^ (-Δ) * (6 * K ^ 2 * qD H (ErrorSign.ofDepth N).opposite D d Δ 3 / Real.log w * (3 / 3))) caseIIQDEndpointCoeff d Δ σ C K / Real.log D * Real.log D ^ (-Δ)

      Exact, uniform estimates for all three non-integral endpoint corrections.

      The first conclusion is the sharp scale actually supplied by the product-ratio and Σ₁₁ terms, namely 1 / log D. The second conclusion has the additional (log D)^(-Δ) because that factor is present in caseIIEndpointQD itself.

      theorem MathlibNt.SieveTheory.SwitchingPrinciple.SuzukiLemma144KappaOne.caseII_nonIntegral_endpoint_corrections_absorb {H : Section13HatLayers} {N : } {D y w d Δ σ C K s : } (hH : Section13HatContract H 2) (hN : Odd N) (hD : Real.exp 1 D) (hy : y = D ^ (1 / 3)) (hw : w = D ^ (1 / σ)) ( : 0 < σ) (hs1 : 1 < s) (hs3 : s 3) (hK : 0 K) (hC : 0 C) (hsmall : 3 ^ d Real.log D) (hScale : 1 Real.log D ^ (-Δ)) :

      Combining the preceding exact estimates with the odd Case-II lower bound for errorEnvelope. The extra premise is displayed because it is precisely what is needed to put the product-ratio and Σ₁₁ terms at the stronger (log D)^(-1-Δ) scale.