Chen 1973, Lemma 2: primitive-character large sieve #
This is a source module for the lemma printed on pp. 113--114 of Chen's 1973
paper. The definitions and theorem statements below retain the paper's exact
objects: the interval M < n ≤ M + N, primitive characters, the weights
q / φ(q) and 1 / φ(q), and the constant X² + π N in equation (2).
The proof on pp. 113--114 has two layers. First, disjoint intervals around the
reduced Farey fractions give equation (4), the sharp additive estimate with
constant X² + π N. Gauss inversion and character orthogonality then give
(2). Finally the source partitions D < q ≤ Q into the cells
2^i D < q ≤ 2^(i+1) D and obtains (3).
The already-proved Gauss/Farey orthogonality layer is reused literally. The
remaining source-calculus sentence (equation (4), whose sharp constant is not
provided by the repository's weaker logarithmic largeSieveBound) is exposed
as Chen1973FareyEquationFour; it is not replaced by the weaker bound.
Chen p. 113: S(α) = ∑_{n=M+1}^{M+N} a_n e(nα).
Equations
- AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973ExponentialSum a M N α = ∑ n ∈ Finset.Icc (M + 1) (M + ↑N), ↑(a n) * AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.charReal (↑n * α)
Instances For
Chen p. 113: Z = ∑_{n=M+1}^{M+N} |a_n|².
Equations
- AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973CoefficientEnergy a M N = ∑ n ∈ Finset.Icc (M + 1) (M + ↑N), |a n| ^ 2
Instances For
The character amplitude occurring verbatim in equations (2) and (3).
Equations
- AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973PrimitiveAmplitude a M N q χ = ∑ n ∈ Finset.Icc (M + 1) (M + ↑N), ↑(a n) * ↑χ ↑n
Instances For
Chen pp. 113--114, equation (4): the sharp reduced-Farey additive estimate. This is exactly the analytic sentence between the disjoint-interval argument and primitive Gauss inversion.
Equations
- AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.Chen1973FareyEquationFour = ∀ (a : ℤ → ℝ) (M : ℤ) (N X : ℕ), ∑ qa ∈ AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.reducedFareyIndices X, ‖AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973ExponentialSum a M N (AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.reducedFareyPoint qa)‖ ^ 2 ≤ (↑X ^ 2 + Real.pi * ↑N) * AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973CoefficientEnergy a M N
Instances For
Unconditional closure of Chen's sharp Farey estimate, equation (4).
Chen p. 113, equation (2), as one literal proposition.
Equations
- AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.Chen1973Lemma2EquationTwo = ∀ (a : ℤ → ℝ) (M : ℤ) (N X : ℕ), ∑ q ∈ Finset.Icc 1 X, ↑q / ↑q.totient * ∑ χ : AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.PrimitiveCharacter q, ‖AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973PrimitiveAmplitude a M N q χ‖ ^ 2 ≤ (↑X ^ 2 + Real.pi * ↑N) * AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973CoefficientEnergy a M N
Instances For
Chen p. 113, equation (3), with the Vinogradov constant made explicit and
its source dependence preserved: one absolute constant works uniformly for
a, M, N, D, Q.
Equations
- AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.Chen1973Lemma2EquationThree = ∃ (C : ℝ), 0 < C ∧ ∀ (a : ℤ → ℝ) (M : ℤ) (N D Q : ℕ), 0 < D → ∑ q ∈ Finset.Ioc D Q, 1 / ↑q.totient * ∑ χ : AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.PrimitiveCharacter q, ‖AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973PrimitiveAmplitude a M N q χ‖ ^ 2 ≤ C * (↑Q + ↑N / ↑D) * AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973CoefficientEnergy a M N
Instances For
Source sentence after (4), pp. 113--114: Gauss inversion plus primitive character orthogonality turns the sharp reduced-Farey estimate into (2). The final conclusion is the literal equation-(2) proposition.
The dyadic modulus decomposition used for equation (3) #
The source cell 2^k D < q ≤ 2^(k+1)D, intersected with (D,Q].
Equations
- AnalyticNumberTheory.LargeSieve.chen1973ModulusCell D Q k = {q ∈ Finset.Ioc D Q | ((q - 1) / D).log2 = k}
Instances For
The dyadic cells partition the complete source interval (D,Q].
One source dyadic cell, obtained from (2) at cutoff 2^(k+1)D and the
pointwise inequality 1/q ≤ 1/(2^k D).
Finite geometric identity used in Chen's dyadic summation.
The reciprocal dyadic tail has total mass at most two.
The exact geometric payment in the proof of (3). The two source sums are
bounded respectively by 8Q and 2πN/D.
Chen p. 114: summing the dyadic cells proves equation (3). We exhibit the
absolute constant 8 + 2π; the printed ≪ only records existence of such a
constant and has no dependence on a, M, N, D, or Q.
Chen's complete Lemma 2 reduction: the sharp Farey equation (4) gives the literal primitive equation (2), and its dyadic summation gives (3).